tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5061273.post6463765641955780753..comments2023-11-03T06:08:34.011-06:00Comments on Third Level Digression: Yahmdallahhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04486390319031344611noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5061273.post-9211589427499830322008-04-17T17:15:00.000-06:002008-04-17T17:15:00.000-06:00Joel's just a douche bag. Let him roam around in a...Joel's just a douche bag. Let him roam around in a silver cloud.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5061273.post-64735775923553013402007-04-18T12:10:00.000-06:002007-04-18T12:10:00.000-06:00Joel,I have gone back and forth over this. Someti...Joel,<BR/><BR/>I have gone back and forth over this. Sometimes I think it's what it looks like, that Oswald did it. Other times, it seems like it's bigger. <BR/><BR/>For me, the CIA guy who's wife was bedded by JFK just seems ... right. I don't think LBJ would've accomplished it (if he was behind it at all), or whomever would've accomplished it, had not that agent been humiliated by JFK.<BR/>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5061273.post-79184920184803698552007-04-18T08:47:00.000-06:002007-04-18T08:47:00.000-06:00Dude, you are veering into UFO territory here. A ...Dude, you are veering into UFO territory here. A much simpler, more plausible, and thoroughly evidentially-verified theory is that a lone wacko shot JFK because he (the shooter) was wacko.<BR/><BR/>Why doesn't this satisfy people? Because great and monstrously evil events seem to call for great and monstrously evil perpetrators. We want to see balance here, like the Nazis balance the HolocaustAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com